:::renaissance chambara:::

Posts on quality, life, culture, the media, news & tech with a twist & a slice of Limey. I moved my blog to http://renaissancehambara.jp in December 2006, go there for the latest content.

Monday, October 02, 2006

 

Blog Post 1,000: The Change Function


As a PR person, it is not enough only be a good paid-shill, but to understand something about your clients. Are they a winner or a flamer?

If they are a flamer, you want your cash up front and start contingency planning for how you replace them with another piece of business.

If they are a winner, then you can be more flexible and possibly take a bath if they are going to be a flagship brand on your client list.

What is the compelling reason to purchase their product or service.


Rule one: Clients are generally too close to their products, consumers will work out how they become relevant to their own lives or not

Rule two: The greatest lie after 'I love you' and 'I can guarantee you coverage in the Financial Times' is 'Our product is unique'. If the problem can be solved another way, it means that the product is not unique because the customer has a substitute choice. Believe: flickr was not unique, it was an innovative way at looking at the same problem. The iPod was not unique, Compaq made the first hard drive-based MP3 player back in the late 90s and the Mac wasn't unique because it got the queues from Doug Engelbart and Xerox PARC.

The Change Function by Pip Coburn makes an interesting read as it shows by example why some technologies take off, while others flame out.

What's the crisis the product or services solves? People will generally only adopt the new, new thing if there is a compelling reason for them.

Is the crisis one for real-world people, or just for rich people (who fly business class three days in every week and think that having a social life is messaging fellow college alumni on their Blackberry once every six weeks)?

How high is the total perceived pain of adoption?

Is your client user-centred: do they use language that shows they look at things from the users point of view?

Do they have an iterative development cycle? (Do they roll out improvements on a regular basis, based on user feedback and their technological roadmap rather than blockbuster updates.)

Pip Coburn elegantly codifies common sense; its the stuff you know instinctively, like the smartphone that you only use voice and texting on and yet still listen to music on your iPod, or the latest cool web 2.0 service that you registered for but then never seem to go back to.

Labels: , , , ,


Create Social Bookmark Links


Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

Archives

03/2004   04/2004   05/2004   06/2004   07/2004   08/2004   09/2004   10/2004   11/2004   12/2004   01/2005   02/2005   03/2005   04/2005   05/2005   06/2005   07/2005   08/2005   09/2005   10/2005   11/2005   12/2005   01/2006   02/2006   03/2006   04/2006   05/2006   06/2006   07/2006   08/2006   09/2006   10/2006   11/2006   12/2006  


Welcome, thanks for visiting and a bit about this blog (:::renaissance chambara::: all in lower case just like UNIX)
Got something to bitch about? Trying to legal the author or want to send scary fan mail? Click here for more details
Want to leave a comment? Feel free, but please take account of the guidelines
The blogroll (there's some missing that Bloglines can't read, if you're not in sort your feeds out)
Subscribe via RSS to :::: renaissance chambara ::::
The grooves that drive :::: renaissance chambara :::: (see what's on our iTunes)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License.

Blogger rox nuffsaid.